8 Thoughts on Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix // Part One

“Anything’s possible if you’ve got enough nerve.”

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix by J. K. Rowling

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

As rankings go, at least so far during this Harry Potter rereadathon, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is one of the better books in the series. The Order of the Phoenix largely deals with propaganda waged by the Ministry of Magic and I recommend it to readers who are interested in fantasy with realistic political themes. Smear campaigns, propaganda, and government corruption are issues that will remain a large part of our lives and the Order of the Phoenix stresses the importance of educating ourselves and questioning sources, the media and powerful authority figures in the digital age of click-bait and fake news.

I can’t help but wonder if willing students of History, Law, and Government and Politics enjoyed the Order of the Phoenix. This is one of the less popular books in the series amongst the fandom and I find myself surprised by this. Similarly, I find that many history enthusiasts, like myself, are major fans of the A Song of Ice and Fire series… and I don’t mean casual viewers. This is my personal reflection, so I would love to hear your thoughts on whether the subjects we enjoyed learning play a key factor in which book genres we consume.

Though the pacing was inconsistent at times and several themes were imperfectly and chaotically explored, rereading the Order of the Phoenix through an adult lens was enlightening. This brings me to question whether the themes were comprehensible for its target audience because, as a child, my unsophisticated mind did not, in the slightest, register the gravity of the politics being explored.

I had far too many thoughts on the Order of the Phoenix and this blog is basically my personal Pensieve, so get ready for some relentless rambling!     


Whenever I stumble upon a character assessment of Cho Chang, I encounter a high volume of venom directed at the grieving Cho. “She’s so weepy” is the common attack hurled at Cho and I find this line of reasoning devoid of any empathy. I think this calls for loud disapproval as I don’t believe that this is an appropriate message to send to anyone: that we should be ashamed of our emotions.

Cho Chang loses her boyfriend, Cedric Diggory, after he is murdered by Lord Voldemort. This is a very valid reason to cry… and cry a whole river. Given that we should all be mental health advocates, isn’t expressing emotion and grief valid especially given the circumstance that Cho is faced with? However, it is also important to understand why readers have adopted this attitude towards Cho Chang and these reasons are two-fold:

  • Harry Potter considers it irritating
  • Ginny Weasley isn’t “weepy”

Harry’s frustration with Cho for repeatedly breaking down in tears is more so in line with the fact that Harry is a classic male teenager who’s uncomfortable and unequipped to deal with shows of emotion. Whatever action Harry is frustrated with should not be taken as the gospel truth of what is right and wrong.


Hermione Granger explains to Harry and Ron why Cho has been frequently emotional allowing us to see things from Cho’s perspective. Ron Weasley, on the other hand, understands that realistically Harry can only be attracted to someone who possesses the traits he finds attractive and Cho doesn’t match what Harry is looking for in a girlfriend.

Harry shouldn’t feel compelled to date Cho. He’s had a lifetime of grief, and Ginny being a more emotionally contained person plays a role in attaining and preserving the peace Harry so longs for. This doesn’t mean that Cho is in any way deficient and undeserving. Nobody is wrong or right here. Harry and Cho are simply incompatible. Ron and Hermione do wonderfully well here as a duo to teach us both empathy and being true to what you want.


Remember how I trashed Hermione for trashing Luna Lovegood? Yeah, well, here I am… eating my words. I choose hard facts over wild speculations.

What we saw here, for those of us who are MBTI enthusiasts, is Ti (introverted thinking) v Te (extraverted thinking). Ti users (Luna Lovegood) seek accuracy and, as a result, find it difficult to rule out, well, a lot and often avoid generalisations. Whereas, high Te users (Hermione Granger) prefer to deal with solid proof and hard facts. They are efficient and prefer making fast judgements which is necessary for law and order. For me, or anyone, to ask Hermione to be open-minded to wild theories is akin to demanding Hermione to play pretty with conspiracy theories.


Hermione attacks Luna’s ideas, but she doesn’t *hate* her. Hermione and Luna approach logic in two wildly different ways; it was only natural that they would butt heads, and I completely understand Hermione’s frustration because I, too, am a person who needs to see some friggin’ concrete evidence (law school, baby) especially if a person should choose to assert questionable opinions and beliefs! But present a good case, make it make sense, and I’ll change my mind.


Yeah, I know, you all relate to Hermione. Because she reads books and was socially awkward at the start. But books and social awkwardness aside, there are a lot of other things about Hermione that I find myself relating to. Tactless? Oh, yeah, I definitely can be. Stubborn? As a goat. Confrontational and passionate? Cross my values, cross my principles, and get ready to see a real-life demon. Facts-oriented and loves a good debate? Yes, and I will shut you down if what you’re saying is absolute nonsense.

Here is my moral quandary: Hermione Granger is J. K. Rowling’s self-insert and that woman gives me the heebie-jeebies. There are a lot of questionable things that Hermione does post-Prisoner of Azkaban which were left unchallenged or unquestioned. J. K. Rowling is too sure of her own self-righteousness to hold her self-insert accountable. She’s too close to the picture to deliver character growth to Hermione believing herself incapable of being morally wrong.

Rowling gives me major Dumb Daenerys vibes. We’ve cheered her on for so long that she believes that she is the only one who knows what is right. In contrast, though George R. R. Martin saw himself in Daenerys for all the privileges of luxury and wealth that was taken away from him, he forged ahead and did not, and I am guessing that he will not, spare Daenerys for her faults. In short, George R. R. Martin did to Daenerys what J. K. Rowling failed to do to Hermione. 

Hermione Granger is one of my favourite characters during this reread because I can’t not root for a character who is very much like me. But neither am I going to pretend that I approve of some of her actions. She has many inspiring traits, but she has her fair share of troubling flaws too. And I will always have Fleur and Sirius as the other two relatable characters of the series. I love Fleur for her high standards and for her ability to graciously accept her own shortcomings. And I love Sirius because much of his trajectory in life is similar to mine – total douche in our teens who later develop a better moral conscience… but not exactly perfect either, and perpetually restless and easily bored.


I propose a new drinking game: every time Harry Potter says, “Er,” you gots to take a shot. And for my halaalies out here, we gotta eat a whole chilli pepper. Don’t look at me all incredulous, we are the spice, the drama, the garam masala, we can handle it just fine.


What are your thoughts on Cho? Is the fandom too harsh on her? Is this the right message to send? What do you think of the Hermione v Luna beef? What are your thoughts on J. K. Rowling now? Do you feel differently towards her now? Will you take on the Harry Potter drinking/all spice challenge? Let me know in the comments!

Sophia Ismaa

Connect with me:

-Let’s talk all things books on Goodreads
-Talk politics, books, TV shows, blogging and life with me on Twitter


  1. 😂 I have to admit I never realised the relationship between Luna and Hermione as far ad I was concerned the one thing they had in common:
    They know Harry Potter.


    1. It was really funny because they’re so different! I used to think it was deep animosity between the pair when I read it when I was young, but now I realise it’s just harmless difference of opinions between the two. But I completely understand Hermione, facts over speculation all day every day!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I agree with you. Cho was annoying because she was annoying to Harry. We have to remember that while the book is in 3rd person, Harry is the lens through which we’re seeing this world, and for a teenager, Cho would be really annoying. The required level of empathy usually comes by later in life. But yeah, Cho and Harry were fundamentally wrong for each other, so I’m glad they didn’t end the books together.

    As for JK, the words “trying too hard” come to mind every time she drops a new bit of fan service on Twitter. I liked the books, and I’ll probably always like them, but I’ve stopped following all of the new fanfictions of her own work when it seemed like she was trying to backpedal and pretend the stories were more inclusive than they actually were.

    And I don’t drink or eat peppers, so I guess I’ll sit out the challenge lol


    1. Very true! I didn’t think of it like that. We kinda have to mature a little bit before we try and see where characters are coming from, but I found it odd on my part because I never saw Cho as being ‘weepy’ and ‘annoying’ – I wouldn’t say it’s down to maturity either, just critical thinking. I do find that quite a lot of adults do still hold on to that view even if it’s incongruent to mental health advocacy, but I guess that’s what this post is for, lol. I’m glad Cho chose a muggle instead, reading the series now, our world seems a bit nicer!

      She definitely comes across as performative. One thing I do understand that she may not simply have the capacity to write books that demonstrate inclusion and present good diversity rep, it’s not every writer forte, she may end up doing more harm than good.

      That sounds like it’s good for your health! How about doing a burpee instead? Or a jumping jack? Might be more trouble than it’s worth.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I’ve only seen a little of the Harry Potter movies and I like stories that are made well. But is a dragon part of this story? I believe that the leviathan in the bible from Job 41: 1-34., was a dragon. I also believe the behemoth from Job 40: 15-24 was a kind of dinosaur. Take care now.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s